Tribal Rights
Syllabus Areas:
GS II - Polity and Governance
GS III - Environment
The Ministry of Tribal Affairs has circulated a draft policy on the relocation and rehabilitation of forest-dwelling Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers living within protected areas (like tiger reserves).
This aims to address the long-standing issue of balancing tribal rights and wildlife conservation.
Previous Framework
- Earlier, relocations were managed under the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA) guidelines and the Project Tiger framework (1973).
- NTCA’s model emphasized voluntary relocation—people could move out of core forest areas with monetary compensation.
- However, over time, several issues emerged: lack of consent, inadequate rehabilitation, and poor oversight.
What Triggered the New Policy
- The Tribal Affairs Ministry received complaints from civil society and state governments about forced or poorly managed relocations.
- It cited the need for a uniform, transparent framework that protects the rights of forest dwellers under the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006.
- The new framework aims to replace the NTCA’s relocation policy with one grounded in equity, dignity, and informed consent.
Features of the New Policy Draft
- The policy proposes clear criteria for identifying who may be relocated and under what circumstances.
- It mandates free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) of affected families.
- Relocation should happen only after Gram Sabha approval and individual compensation.
- There will be independent monitoring, annual social audits, and the creation of a National Rehabilitation and Ecosystem Restoration Commission.
- The policy emphasizes ecological restoration of vacated areas while ensuring sustainable livelihoods for resettled families.
Why This Matters
- Relocation from protected areas has been a contentious issue, often pitting conservationists against tribal rights activists.
- Mismanaged relocations have led to loss of livelihoods, cultural disintegration, and legal conflicts over FRA rights.
- The policy seeks to harmonize conservation efforts with human rights obligations.
- India currently has 53 tiger reserves; over 66,000 families have reportedly been relocated since 1973, many without proper consent or benefits.
Broader Implications
- The draft aims to ensure relocations are truly voluntary and legally compliant with the Forest Rights Act.
- It reflects a shift from a “fortress conservation” model (evicting people for wildlife protection) to a rights-based conservation
- Success will depend on coordination between the Environment and Tribal Affairs ministries, and strict implementation by state governments.
Prelims Questions:
1. Under the draft policy on relocation and rehabilitation of forest-dwelling communities, which of the following statements is/are correct?
- It proposes the establishment of a National Rehabilitation and Ecosystem Restoration Commission.
- It mandates free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) of affected families before relocation.
- The policy allows relocation without Gram Sabha consent if the area is declared a critical tiger habitat.
Select the correct answer:
- 1 only
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
1. Consider the following statements regarding the glymphatic system:
- It is responsible for removing metabolic waste from the brain during sleep.
- The process is regulated by the neurotransmitter norepinephrine.
- Sleeping pills enhance the glymphatic system's efficiency.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- 1 and 2 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 1, 2, and 3
2. Consider the following statements regarding relocation from tiger reserves:
- Relocation must be voluntary and based on informed consent.
- Compensation includes land-for-land or monetary packages.
- Relocation without FRA compliance is a violation of law.
Which of the above statements are correct?
- 1 and 2 only
- 1 and 3 only
- 2 and 3 only
- 1, 2 and 3
3. Which of the following pairs are correctly matched?
| Organisation/Policy | Primary Function |
|---|---|
| 1. NTCA | Conservation of tigers and management of tiger reserves |
| 2. FRA, 2006 | Recognition of rights of forest dwellers |
| 3. New Draft Policy (2024) | Framework for voluntary relocation and ecosystem restoration |
Select the correct answer using the code below:
- only one
- only two
- All Three
- None